Shigeru Miyamoto is known to have compared Mario to Mickey Mouse on several occasioins. Here's what he said in an Entertainment Weekly interview:
A survey conducted in the 1990s showed that Mario was actually more recognizable to American children than Mickey Mouse.
Do you guys agree with this analogy? Are there other similarities in how Nintendo and Disney treat their favorite mascots? Does Mickey have a slightly more universal appeal than Mario worldwide?
It seems Miyamoto views Mario as a character symbolic of the videogame industry as a whole. While Mario games don't use photorealistic graphics, their gameplay has been representative of the progress in game technology, and of course, Super Mario Bros. and Super Mario 64 brought 2D and 3D gaming, respectively, to the masses.When I first worked on the very first Mario game, I thought I would make Mario again and again, so that it would grow in conjunction with the technology. Mickey Mouse is a character that grew with the evolution of animation technology and motion picture technology. I thought that maybe I could do the same thing with Mario — he would be the character who grew with the evolution of digital technology.
A survey conducted in the 1990s showed that Mario was actually more recognizable to American children than Mickey Mouse.
Do you guys agree with this analogy? Are there other similarities in how Nintendo and Disney treat their favorite mascots? Does Mickey have a slightly more universal appeal than Mario worldwide?